I don't have much new to add, but I want to make some clarifying comments:

First, there are clearly workarounds available. I am using one now. R is installed on a personal laptop which I bring to work every day. I take extreme care with the nature of the files I move back and forth, and none of this is classified. This is common practice here. Yes, it would be nice if I could get R onto my desktop machine at work. It would save me burning CDs to move plots back and forth. But it's not the end of the world. My ability to get work done is not the issue here.

The issue is the following: Is there anything her which is of concern to the R community? I suspect the answer is no, but cannot say anything for sure at this point.

The registry analysis tool looks like it is custom software developed by the Air Force. I can't get any specific information beyond that. That is unfortunate, since it would be nice if the tests could be duplicated and confirmed.

We will get separate tests on R without RStudio.

The registry analysis reports results in two sections: Registry entries added and registry entries modified. There were no vulnerabilities found in the "entries modified" section. All of the vulnerabilities are listed under "entries added".

I will let you know if I find out anything else. Certainly the isolated test of the R software without RStudio will be of interest.

Thank you all or your comments,

Paul Martin

On 5/9/2012 10:00 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
Someone said:
Once R is accepted, you could ask for an RStudio test if you want.
  I had another thought shortly after my initial email. Suppose yes, R
is accepted. Great. You run R.

  Then you think, "Oh, I need ggplot2" (yes you do). Do you then have
to get security clearance for every package you want to download from
CRAN?

Barry


______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to