for example the same model with intercept R² = 0.6, without intercept R²
= 0.9 and higher. In my definition of R², R² has to be equal or less
without intercept

I do not know what R shows, but in the summary of the model without
intercept it does not show the R² of the regression line.

When I run a regression I like to have the R² of the regression line and
not something else. ;)




Am 27-06-2012 10:25, schrieb Uwe Ligges:
> 
> 
> On 27.06.2012 09:33, Christof Kluß wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> is there a command that calculates the correct adjusted R-squared, when
>> I work without intercept? (The R-squared from lm without intercept is
>> false.)
> 
> Then we need your definition of your version of "correct" - we know the
> definition of your version of "false".
> 
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
> 
> 
>>
>> Greetings
>> Chrsitof
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Dipl.-Inf. Christof Kluß (Raum 223) | Universität Kiel
Inst. für Pflanzenbau und -züchtung | www.gfo.uni-kiel.de
Grünland u. Futterbau/Ökol. Landbau | ckl...@gfo.uni-kiel.de
Hermann-Rodewald Str. 9, 24118 Kiel | Tel. 0431 880-2197

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to