for example the same model with intercept R² = 0.6, without intercept R² = 0.9 and higher. In my definition of R², R² has to be equal or less without intercept
I do not know what R shows, but in the summary of the model without intercept it does not show the R² of the regression line. When I run a regression I like to have the R² of the regression line and not something else. ;) Am 27-06-2012 10:25, schrieb Uwe Ligges: > > > On 27.06.2012 09:33, Christof Kluß wrote: >> Hi >> >> is there a command that calculates the correct adjusted R-squared, when >> I work without intercept? (The R-squared from lm without intercept is >> false.) > > Then we need your definition of your version of "correct" - we know the > definition of your version of "false". > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > >> >> Greetings >> Chrsitof >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> PLEASE do read the posting guide >> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> > > -- Dipl.-Inf. Christof Kluß (Raum 223) | Universität Kiel Inst. für Pflanzenbau und -züchtung | www.gfo.uni-kiel.de Grünland u. Futterbau/Ökol. Landbau | ckl...@gfo.uni-kiel.de Hermann-Rodewald Str. 9, 24118 Kiel | Tel. 0431 880-2197 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
