On Oct 24, 2012, at 8:32 AM, Lopez, Dan wrote:
> The examples I gave--Null, Empty string, white space, etc where just examples
> based on SPSS Modeler's Data Audit node.
>
> I just want something that both identifies the columns having missing
> values-- regardless of what they technically are stored as(NA or a field with
> space bar hit a couple of times,etc) -- and tabulates based on what type of
> missing value. This is a basic data exploration step that I thought just
> maybe comes standard in R and that I just don't know of yet.
In none of your examples below do you create factor columns with any of the
features you say that you are hoping to identify. No NA's, no "white-space"
levels, no "999" values. I do not (and never have) used SPSS Modeler's Data
Audit, so definition by analogy is not going to work for me.
>
>
> Hmisc::describe is good and may have to suffice. "Missing" for the example
> below using Hmisc::describe was 0 although there was a "". And I know that's
> because of the technical difference.
Right. Hmisc::describe counts the number of NA's. A value of "" or " " is not
the same as the R NA "missing".
> is.na(factor(""))
[1] FALSE
> is.na(factor(NA))
[1] TRUE
> is.na(factor(" "))
[1] FALSE
If you want to test for an empty string use nchar(vec) == 0
I offered an earlier suggestion for a grepl test for all spaces.
> #EXAMPLE data - just one column in this case
>> dput(sample(mydata$COMMUTE_BIN,100))
> structure(c(2L, 5L, 3L, 2L, 6L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 2L, 4L, 3L,
> 4L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 6L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 6L,
> 3L, 2L, 6L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 7L, 3L, 5L, 2L, 3L, 2L,
> 2L, 6L, 7L, 7L, 4L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 5L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L,
> 2L, 5L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 6L, 4L, 6L, 2L, 7L, 4L, 6L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 2L,
> 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 3L, 5L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 2L,
> 4L, 5L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 1L), .Label = c("", "<15", "15 - 24",
> "25 - 34", "35 - 44", "45 - 54", "55+"), class = "factor")
>
> As David mentioned maybe I will have to create my own function. Maybe
> something similar to what I got here for identifying a factor columns, column
> labels and number of levels.
> #EXAMPLE of formula I will probably need to create for identifying and
> listing column names and counts of NA and "" and other "missing" in a
> dataframe or table. In this case however I am listing factor columns and
> excluding columns w/ >32 levels
> set.seed(1)
> dat1<-
> data.frame(col1=factor(sample(1:25,10,replace=TRUE)),col2=sample(letters[1:10],10,replace=TRUE),col3=factor(rep(1:5,each=2)))
> PrintLvls2 <- function(x)
> {print(data.frame(Lvls=sapply(x[sapply(x,function(x)
> is.factor(x)&&length(levels(x))<=32)],nlevels),
>
> Names=sapply(x[sapply(x, function(x) is.factor(x)&&length(levels(x))<=32)],
>
> function(y) paste0(levels(y), collapse=", "))), right=FALSE)}
>> PrintLvls2(dat1)
> Lvls Names
> col1 9 2, 6, 7, 10, 15, 16, 17, 23, 24
> col2 7 b, c, d, e, g, h, j
> col3 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
I find it good to put in counter-examples such as a column that is non-factor.
I thought that a non-factor column would probably break your code, but happily
it survived. You might think about writing two functions: one to pick the
columns to be assessed and the other to return a structured object from the
candidates.
--
david.
>
> Thanks.
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bert Gunter [mailto:gunter.ber...@gene.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 3:15 PM
> To: David Winsemius
> Cc: Lopez, Dan; R help (r-help@r-project.org)
> Subject: Re: [R] Summary of variables with NA, empty
>
> To highlight:
>
> "Basically all Null values" is a meaningless phrase in R. ?Null ?NA ?NaN have
> **very specific meanings** in R and have nothing to do with the various sorts
> of whitespace characters that David mentions (spaces, tabs...). If you wish
> to use R, you **must** understand the distinctions (the Intro to R tutorial
> discusses some of this -- have you read it?).
>
> There is functionality to test for these sorts of things (is.na, is.null,
> etc). You need to put in the effort to learn about this if you mean to use R
> in any serious way, as these will occur in either data I/O (NA's) or data
> manipulation (e.g. 0/0)
>
> -- Bert
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:44 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Lopez, Dan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a function I can use on my dataframe to give me a concise summary
>>> of variables that are NA,blank,etc? Basically all Null values, Empty
>>> strings, white space, blank values. Ideally it would look something like
>>> the below:
>>>
>>> # it should only includes the fields with NAs, blanks, etc. Added bonus
>>> would be to include column Index.
>>> #Valid Records = records that are not NA, blank,etc #ColIndex - what
>>> place is column in the original dataframe...1,2,3, ...xth
>>>
>>> Valid Records Null (NA?) Empty String White
>>> Space Blank Value ColIndex
>>
>> Would a "Valid Record" be defined by grep([^ ], column)? ... i.e. has
>> a non-space character in it What is a "ColIndex"?
>> How is an "Empty String" different than "White Space" or a "Blank Value"
>>
>>
>>
>>> Var1 52 8
>>> 2
>>> Var2 40 20
>>> 10 10
>>> 3
>>> Var3 58
>>> 2
>>> 20
>>> ..
>>>
>>
>> I generally use describe from package:Hmisc. There are other versions of
>> describe in other packages. It's not going to classify items composed
>> entirely of a varying number of spaces and other non-character items like
>> tabs as a single group. And it's unclear what you will use as an operational
>> definition to separate blanks and white-space. You will probably need to
>> code that yourself. You might want to look at the code for Hmisc::describe
>> as a starting point.
>>
>>
>>> I now there is summary() but I am not sure if that always displays NAs and
>>> blanks especially with factor variables that have several levels (lumps
>>> them in 'Other' when I run the entire dataframe).
>>
>>
>>> In these instances I can run the individual field separately and see all
>>> levels but that would be inefficient to do for a dataframe with over 50
>>> variables.
>>
>> How were you going to "run the individual field"? If you show us code, there
>> might be more rapid progress. It would probably be very easy to turn that
>> into a function that could then be "run" with `lapply`.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>>
>> David Winsemius, MD
>> Alameda, CA, USA
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bert Gunter
> Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics
>
> Internal Contact Info:
> Phone: 467-7374
> Website:
> http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm
David Winsemius, MD
Alameda, CA, USA
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
