Dear Ryan,
On 11 October 2013 16:50, Ryan Morrison <ryan.r.morri...@me.com> wrote:
> The cpquery function is definitely easier to use given that my evidence is
> contained in lists.
For the record, this is not a general solution to the bug. It's true
that likelihood weighting (method = "lw") is easier to use in a
programmatic way, but it is much more limited in the events you can
use for conditioning. Logic sampling (method = "ls") accepts an
arbitrary R expression as a conditioning event; likelihood weighting
at the moment accepts only a single instantiation of the conditioning
variables.
Cheers,
Marco
--
Marco Scutari, Ph.D.
Research Associate, Genetics Institute (UGI)
University College London (UCL), United Kingdom
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
