Dear Ryan,
On 11 October 2013 20:44, Ryan Morrison <ryan.r.morri...@me.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. For my immediate purposes I think using the
> likelihood
> weighting method will suffice. I'm calculating conditional probabilities
> based on a
> single instantiation each time I use the function. The evidence I use for
> instantiation
> changes for each i+1 in my loop, and a new probability is computed using the
> new
> evidence. Since I'm using a single instantiation of the conditioning
> variables for each
> calculation in my loop, I believe the likelihood weighting method will work.
> Don't
> hesitate to correct me if I'm wrong.
>From your description, likelihood weighting should be fine.
Cheers,
Marco
--
Marco Scutari, Ph.D.
Research Associate, Genetics Institute (UGI)
University College London (UCL), United Kingdom
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
