Dear all,
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Liviu Andronic <landronim...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems that StackOverflow is officially proposing user-generated > content for download/mirroring: > http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2014/01/stack-exchange-cc-data-now-hosted-by-the-internet-archive/?cb=1 > > "All community-contributed content on Stack Exchange is licensed under > the Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license. " And it is currently being > mirrored at least at the Internet Archive: > https://archive.org/details/stackexchange > > So, in principle, it would be possible/desirable to: > - spin the 'r' tag from StackOverflow and propose an r.stackexchange.com at > http://area51.stackexchange.com/categories/8/technology . Such a SE > site would be similar to http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ > As Duncan suggested earlier, tying R Core to StackExchange may or may not be a good idea as it would make it somewhat dependent on external corporate interests. (Personally I see both advantages and disadvantages.) So in the end my proposal is not necessarily for r-help to go to SE, but more for R to have its own Q&A forum/wiki for helping R users. This could perfectly take the form of setting up its own open-source https://github.com/ialbert/biostar-central Q&A interface (a SE-like web interface) on R Core's servers. In this case the website would look like the following: http://www.biostars.org/ . Regards, Liviu > - involve R Core to give blessing for using the R logo, if necessary. > This would be similar to what Ubuntu does with AskUbuntu: > http://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/5444/is-ask-ubuntu-official-ubuntu > - set a mirror on r-project.org for all the user content that is > produced by r.stackexchange.com , and thus allow R Core to keep the > info publicly available at all times. The mirroring on Internet > Archive would still hold. > > >> 2. I think an interface like StackOverflow is better than the mailing list >> interface, and will eventually win out. R-help needs to do nothing, once >> someone puts together something like StackOverflow that attracts most of the >> people who give good answers, R-help will just fade away. >> > The advantages for such a move are countless (especially wrt to > efficiently organizing R-related knowledge and directing users to > appropriate sources of info), so I won't go into that. I would only > note that most 'r-sig-*' MLs would become obsolete in such a setup, > and would be replaced by the much more efficient tagging system of the > SE Q&A web interface (for example, all posts appropriate for r-sig-gui > would simply be tagged with 'gui'; no need for duplicated efforts of > monitoring multiple mailing lists). > > Opinions? > > Liviu > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader Do you know how to write? http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.