Dear Lalitha, see inline below

On 03/05/2015 10:19, Lalitha Viswanathan wrote:
Hi
I have a dataset of the type attached.
Here's my code thus far.
dataset <-data.frame(read.delim("data", sep="\t", header=TRUE));
newData<-subset(dataset, select = c(Price, Reliability, Mileage, Weight,
Disp, HP));

In fact in the file the variable seems to be called Disp.

cor(newData, method="pearson");
Results are
                  Price Reliability    Mileage     Weight       Disp
HP
Price        1.0000000          NA -0.6537541  0.7017999  0.4856769
  0.6536433
Reliability         NA           1         NA         NA         NA
NA
Mileage     -0.6537541          NA  1.0000000 -0.8478541 -0.6931928
-0.6667146
Weight       0.7017999          NA -0.8478541  1.0000000  0.8032804
  0.7629322
Disp         0.4856769          NA -0.6931928  0.8032804  1.0000000
  0.8181881
HP           0.6536433          NA -0.6667146  0.7629322  0.8181881
  1.0000000

It appears that Wt and Price, Wt and Disp, Wt and HP, Disp and HP, HP and
Price are strongly correlated.
To find the statistical significance,
I am trying  sample.correln<-cor.test(newData$Disp, newData$HP,
method="kendall", exact=NULL)
Kendall's rank correlation tau

data:  newx$Disp and newx$HP
z = 7.2192, p-value = 5.229e-13
alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
sample estimates:
       tau
0.6563871

If I try the same with
sample.correln<-cor.test(newData$Disp, newData$HP, method="pearson",
exact=NULL)

When I try that it works fine.
The real question is why when you asked it for the Pearson coefficient it decided to give you the Spearman as the warning message below points out. I suspect you have done something else which you did not tell us about.

I get Warning message:
In cor.test.default(newx$Disp, newx$HP, method = "spearman", exact = NULL) :
   Cannot compute exact p-value with ties
sample.correln

Spearman's rank correlation rho

data:  newx$Disp and newx$HP
S = 5716.8, p-value < 2.2e-16
alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
sample estimates:
       rho
0.8411566

I am not sure how to interpret these values.
Basically, I am trying to figure out which combination of factors
influences efficiency.

Thanks
Lalitha



______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


--
Michael
http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to