Julia S. <julia.schroeder <at> gmail.com> writes: > Now, I did that in my article and I got a response from a reviewer that I > additionally should give the degrees of freedom, and the F-statistics. From > what I read here, that would be incorrect to do, and I sort of intuitively > also understand why (at least I think I do). ... > Well, writing on my rebuttal, I find myself being unable to explain in a > few, easy to understand (and, at the same time, correct) sentences stating > that it is not a good idea to report (most likely wrong) dfs and F > statistics. Can somebody here help me out with a correct explanation for a > laymen?
Feeling with you, and hoping some day this will be resolved. I am sure you have read Douglas Bates' http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02a/archive/76742.html but I thought this was temporary. The only workaround I have is not to use lmer for gaussian models. Dieter ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
