I didn't know about crantastic actually.
I've looked what it is exactly and it indeed looks interesting, but I don't really see how I would know that it would help me for the task. There's a description of what it was built for, but how can I then know which function from this package can help me?

Thanks for your answer (you all), I'll work on it!
I'll keep you informed if it doesn't work (!), and I'll go vote on crantastic when I'll have a bit more experience with the packages I use (right now I'm just using the ones I was told for one specific function), but don't worry I won't forget. As you said "It only works if users contribute to it". That makes the power of R!

Ivan



Le 1/21/2010 19:01, Matthew Dowle a écrit :
One way is :

dataset = data.table(ssfamed)
dataset[,<  whatever "some functions" are on Asfc, Smc, epLsar, etc>,
by="SPECSHOR,BONE"]

Your SPECSHOR and BONE names will be in your result alongside the results of
the<whatever ...>

Or try package plyr which does this sort of thing too.  And sqldf may be
better if you know SQL and prefer it.  There are actually zillions of ways
to do it : by(), doBy() etc etc

If you get your code working the way its constructed currently,  its going
to be very slow, because of those "==".   data.table doesn't do that and is
pretty fast for this kind of thing. You might find that plyr is easier to
use and more flexible though if speed isn't an issue,  depending on exactly
what you want to do.

Whichever way you decide,  consider voting on crantastic for the package you
end up using,  and that may be a quick and easy way for you to help new R
users in the future, and help us all by reducing the r-help traffic on the
same subject over and over again.

Note that plyr is the 2nd spot on crantastic,  it would have solved your
problem without needing to write that code.  If you check crantastic first
and make sure you're aware of popular packages, it might avoid getting stuck
in this way again.  It only works if users contribute to it though.


"Ivan Calandra"<ivan.calan...@uni-hamburg.de>  wrote in message
news:4b587cdd.4070...@uni-hamburg.de...
Hi everybody!

To use some functions, I have to transform my dataset into a list, where
each element contains one group, and I have to prepare a list for each
variable I have (altogether I have 15 variables, and many entries per
factor level)

Here is some part of my dataset:
SPECSHOR    BONE    Asfc    Smc    epLsar
cotau    tx    454.390369    29.261638    0.001136
cotau    tx    117.445711    4.291884    0.00056
cotau    tx    381.024682    15.313017    0.002324
cotau    tx    159.081789    18.134533    0.000462
cotau    tm    160.641503    6.411332    0.000571
cotau    tm    79.238023    3.828254    0.001182
cotau    tm    143.20655    11.921899    0.000192
cotau    tm    115.476996    33.116386    0.000417
cotau    tm    594.256234    72.538131    0.000477
eqgre    tx    188.261324    8.279096    0.000777
eqgre    tx    152.444216    2.596325    0.001022
eqgre    tx    256.601507    8.279096    0.000566
eqgre    tx    250.816445    18.134533    0.000535
eqgre    tx    272.396711    24.492879    0.000585
eqgre    tm    172.63264    4.291884    0.001781
eqgre    tm    189.441097    14.425498    0.001347
eqgre    tm    170.743788    13.564472    0.000602
eqgre    tm    158.960849    10.385299    0.001189
eqgre    tm    80.972408    3.828254    0.000644
gicam    tx    294.494001    9.656738    0.000524
gicam    tx    267.126765    19.128024    0.000647
gicam    tx    81.888658    4.782006    0.000492
gicam    tx    168.32908    12.729939    0.001097
gicam    tx    123.296056    7.007427    0.000659
gicam    tm    94.264887    18.134533    0.000752
gicam    tm    54.317395    3.828254    0.00038
gicam    tm    55.978883    17.167534    0.000141
gicam    tm    279.597993    15.313017    0.000398
gicam    tm    288.262556    18.134533    0.001043

What I do next is:
----
list_Asfc<- list()
list_Asfc[[1]]<- ssfamed[ssfamed$SPECSHOR=='cotau'&ssfamed$BONE=='tx', 3]
list_Asfc[[2]]<- ssfamed[ssfamed$SPECSHOR=='cotau'&ssfamed$BONE=='tm', 3]
----

And so on for each level of SPECSHOR and BONE

I'm stuck on 2 parts:
- in a loop or something similar, I would like the 1st element of the
list to be filled by the values for the 1st variable with the first
level of my factors (i.e. cotau + tx), and then the 2nd element with the
2nd level (i.e. cotau + tm) and so on. As shown above, I know how to do
it if I enter manually the different levels, but I have no idea which
function I should use so that each combination of factor will be used.
See what I mean?

- I would then like to run it in a loop or something for each variable.
It is by itself not so complicated, but I don't know how to give the
correct name to my list. I want the list containing the data for Asfc to
be named "list_Asfc".
Here is what I tried:
----
seq.num<- c(seq(3,5,1))     #the indexes of the variables
for(i in 1:length(seq.num)) {
  k<- seq.num[i]
  name.num<- names(ssfamed)[k]
  list<- list()
  list[[1]]<- ssfamed[ssfamed$SPECSHOR=='cotau'&ssfamed$BONE=='tx', i]
  list[[2]]<- ssfamed[ssfamed$SPECSHOR=='cotau'&ssfamed$BONE=='tm', i]
  names(list)<- c("cotau_tx", "cotau_tm")     #I have more and the 1st
question should help me on that too
}
----
After names(list) I need to insert something like: name_list<- list
But I don't know how to give it the correct name. How do we change the
name of an object? Or am I on the wrong path?

Thank you in advance for your help.
Ivan

PS: if necessary: under Windows XP, R2.10.












[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to