? merge

> obs <- read.table(textConnection("12866   14.4
+
+ 12844   14.1
+
+ 12843   16.5
+ 12860   14.9
+ 12851    9.8
+
+ 12846   15.3"), col.names=c('station', 'obs'))
> fore <- read.table(textConnection("12830   12.808611
+ 12836   12.725081
+ 12843   15.241580
+ 12844   15.185887
+ 12846   13.723515
+ 12851    8.498717
+ 12860   15.715260
+ 12866   14.262023
+ 12870   12.968392"), col.names=c('station', 'fore'))
> closeAllConnections()
>
> # use 'merge' to group them
>
> x <- merge(obs, fore, by="station", all=TRUE)
>
> x
  station  obs      fore
1   12830   NA 12.808611
2   12836   NA 12.725081
3   12843 16.5 15.241580
4   12844 14.1 15.185887
5   12846 15.3 13.723515
6   12851  9.8  8.498717
7   12860 14.9 15.715260
8   12866 14.4 14.262023
9   12870   NA 12.968392
>

You can then order by the first column.

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Csima Gabriella <csim...@met.hu> wrote:
> Dear Everyone,
>
>
>
> I 've just begun to use the library ncdf and I would like to compare 
> meteorological observational data with forecast data, so to make 
> verification. The netcdf files I'm using contain data of many different 
> parameters in many different stations.  I could read easily that I needed, 
> but naturally I do not need the data of all the stations. On the other hand, 
> the order of the stations is not the same in the observation files and in the 
> forecast files.
>
> Let's take that I have a list of those stations (with station numbers) where 
> I would like to make the verification. I read the observations in all the 
> possible stations and I receive a data.frame (first column with the station 
> numbers, second column with - let' say - the temperature data...and naturally 
> we can have more columns with different parameters). I make the same with the 
> forecast data, as I wrote the orders of the station numbers in the two 
> dataset are different, and naturally there are some stations that you can 
> find in one data.frame but not in the other.
>
>
>
> How could I make (or rewrite) my two data.frames (observation and forecast), 
> where the first coulumn is totally the same as in the station list (even the 
> order of the stations)??
>
>
>
> For example, I have this data.frame as obsesrvation:
>
>
>
> 12866   14.4
>
> 12844   14.1
>
> 12843   16.5
> 12860   14.9
> 12851    9.8
>
> 12846   15.3
>
>
>
>
>
> ...and  have this data.frame as forecast:
>
>
>
> 12830   12.808611
> 12836   12.725081
> 12843   15.241580
> 12844   15.185887
> 12846   13.723515
> 12851    8.498717
> 12860   15.715260
> 12866   14.262023
> 12870   12.968392
>
>
> ...and my list of the stations I needed
>
>
>
> 12836
> 12843
> 12846
> 12860
> 12870
>
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for your help or suggestions in advance!
>
> Gabriella Csima
>
> csim...@met.hu
>
>
>
>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>



-- 
Jim Holtman
Cincinnati, OH
+1 513 646 9390

What is the problem that you are trying to solve?

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to