Thanks so much, Martin and Andy for your help. I understand it now.

Pauline

At 03:00 PM 10/25/2003 +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>> "Pauline" == Pauline Gu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>     on Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:03:23 -0700 writes:

    Pauline> Hello, experts, Does the number of input for
    Pauline> training set need to be the same as the number of
    Pauline> input for the data set that I am trying to predict
    Pauline> from the nnet result of the training?

If `` the number of input '' is what we usually call
   "number of (explanatory) variables",
then
   the answer is "yes".

If instead, you mean "number of cases", "number of
   observations", or "number of (ex|s)amples"
the answer is "no".

Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/
Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum  LEO C16    Leonhardstr. 27
ETH (Federal Inst. Technology)  8092 Zurich     SWITZERLAND
phone: x-41-1-632-3408          fax: ...-1228                   <><

______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help

Reply via email to