On Thu, 27 May 2004 22:55:20 +0200, "Torsten Steuernagel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>> 2. Is it true >> that one can gain execution speed by accessing slots using the >> function slots(object,name,check=FALSE)<-value would speed up >> execution? > >Try this: > >> get("@<-") >function (object, name, value) >{ > arg <- substitute(name) > if (is.name(arg)) > name <- as.character(arg) > "slot<-"(object, name, TRUE, value) >} > >So "@<-" actually calls "slot<-". Using "slot<-" instead, you save the >additional overhead the call to "@<-" introduces. If there will be a real >performance gain in replacing "@<-" certainly depends on what you're >doing. I'd advise against doing this kind of optimization. It will make your code harder to maintain, and while it might be faster today, if "@<-" is really a major time sink, it's an obvious candidate for optimization in R, e.g. by making it .Internal or .Primitive. When that happens, your "optimized" code will likely be slower (if it even works at all). Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html