On 1 Jun 2004 at 12:44, Jari Oksanen wrote:
> There are several other things that were fully documented and still
> were removed. One of the latest cases was print.coefmat which was
> abruptly made Defunct without warning or grace period: code written
> for 1.8* didn't work in 1.9.0 and if corrected for 1.9.0 it wouldn't
> work in pre-1.9.0. Anything can change in R without warning, and your
> code may be broken anytime. Just be prepared.
I see your point. But in this case, wouldn't one consider "slot<-" as a
part of the core language ? Even if there are further changes to the
methods package I doubt that there will be a compelling reason to drop
"slot<-" or changing it in an incompatible way (maybe the "check"
argument may go away but this isn't described in "Programming with
Data" anyway). It's possible of course, but not very likely, I think.
- Torsten
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
