Adelchi, I have a similar situation where I had made all of the typical academic references within the code and documentation for a small but important function my package uses. I was asked by the CRAN reviewers to add the author of that function to the DESCRIPTION Authors@R section. I added the following: person("Terry", "Therneau", role = c("aut”))
Mark R. Mark Sharp, Ph.D. Data Scientist and Biomedical Statistical Consultant 7526 Meadow Green St. San Antonio, TX 78251 mobile: 210-218-2868 rmsh...@me.com > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Adelchi Azzalini <azzal...@stat.unipd.it> > Subject: [R] a question of etiquette > Date: June 1, 2020 at 11:34:00 AM CDT > To: r-h...@r-project.org > > The new version of a package which I maintain will include a new function > which I have ported to R from Matlab. > The documentation of this R function indicates the authors of the original > Matlab code, reference to their paper, URL of the source code. > > Question: is this adequate, or should I include them as co-authors of the > package, or as contributors, or what else? > Is there a general policy about this matter? > > Adelchi Azzalini > http://azzalini.stat.unipd.it/ > > ______________________________________________ > r-h...@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel