Ben,

Thank you for the advice. I will submit a new minor revision after addressing 
the issue you pointed out.

Mark

R. Mark Sharp
7526 Meadow Green St.
San Antonio, TX 78251
mobile: 210-218-2868
[email protected]




> On Jan 15, 2026, at 12:28 PM, Ben Bolker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I don't think that answers the OP's question (why was it archived
> after apparently passing checks/being published)?
> 
> I do get one error (reproduced below) when I `R CMD check --as-cran`
> on Linux with r-devel.
> 
>  I would say that the path of least resistance would be: (1) fix the
> error (assuming you can reproduce it ...); (2) bump the version number
> to 1.0.9 (or 1.0.8.1, whatever); (3) (re)submit to CRAN.
> 
> [24s/43s] ERROR
> Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
> Last 13 lines of output:
>    'test_saveDataframesAsFiles.R:11:3', 'test_saveDataframesAsFiles.R:37:3',
>    'test_saveDataframesAsFiles.R:62:3'
> 
>  ══ Failed tests
> ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
>  ── Failure ('test_print.summary.nprcgenekeeprErr.R:29:3'):
> print.summary.nprcgenekeeprErr prints expected output ──
>  Expected failure message to match regexp "produced output".
>  Actual message:
>  ✖ │ Expected `print(summary(qcStudbook(pedOne, reportErrors =
> TRUE)))` to produce no output.
>    │ Actual output:
>    │ Error: The animal listed as a sire and also listed as a female
> is: s1.\nError: The animal listed as a dam and also listed as a male
> is: d1.\n\nPlease check and correct the pedigree file.\n \nAnimal
> records where parent records are suspicous because of dates.\nOne or
> more parents appear too young at time of birth.\n  dam sire id sex
> birth recordStatus exit  sireBirth   damBirth sireAge\n2  d2   s1 o2
> F 2009-03-17     original <NA> 2000-07-18 2015-09-16    8.66\n3  d2
> s2 o3   F 2012-04-11     original <NA> 2006-06-19 2015-09-16
> 5.81\n4  d2   s2 o4   M 2006-04-13     original <NA> 2006-06-19
> 2015-09-16   -0.18\n  damAge\n2   -6.5\n3   -3.4\n4   -9.4
> 
>  [ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 24 | PASS 861 ]
>  Error:
>  ! Test failures.
>  Execution halted
> 
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 1:13 PM Henrik Bengtsson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Sorry to hear. From https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES.in (*):
>> 
>> "Package: nprcgenekeepr
>> X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2025-07-29 as issues were not corrected in time.
>>  .
>>  Tested elapsed times.
>> X-CRAN-History: Archived on 2022-11-03 as check problems were not corrected
>> despite reminders.
>>  Unarchived on 2025-04-24."
>> 
>> (*) That file is a hard-yo-remember "internal" URL. You can find it via
>> https://www.cranhaven.org/.
>> 
>> 
>> How this helps,
>> 
>> Henrik
>> 
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026, 09:52 R. Mark Sharp <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I submitted an update based on needing to make some changes due to
>>> dependencies. As appended below, I received a message July 25, 2025 that
>>> the updated package (1.0.8) was on its way to CRAN. I checked shortly after
>>> July 25th and the package was published. However, it appears 1.0.8 was
>>> removed on July 29th. I do not see a problem on
>>> https://cran-archive.r-project.org/web/checks/2025/2025-07-29_check_results_nprcgenekeepr.html
>>> 
>>> I have contacted [email protected] <mailto:
>>> [email protected]> to find out what I need to do to rectify
>>> this but have not gotten a response. Suggestions are welcome.
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> R. Mark Sharp, Ph.D.
>>> 7526 Meadow Green St.
>>> San Antonio, TX 78251
>>> mobile: 210-218-2868
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [CRAN-pretest-publish] CRAN Submission nprcgenekeepr 1.0.8
>>> Date: July 25, 2025 at 10:56:10 PM CDT
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> Dear maintainer,
>>> 
>>> thanks, package nprcgenekeepr_1.0.8.tar.gz is on its way to CRAN.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> CRAN teams' auto-check service
>>> Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
>>> Check: *, Result: OK
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> [email protected] mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>> 
>> 
>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> 
>> ______________________________________________
>> [email protected] mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Reply via email to