Nicholas,

this is unlikely; if true, the author would have done well to update his software page http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~toby/alan/software/ and the corresponding wikipedia entry, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPC_General_Polygon_Clipper_Library

Even (some) universities can these days be very picky with licensing when someone at the administration level smells money revenues from software developed by one of the employees; they might claim that anything produced by the employees in work time is owned by the university.

Best wishes,
--
Edzer

Nicholas Lewin-Koh wrote:
Hi Roger,
I thought I remembered that at some point you had contacted the author
of gpclib and gotten permission to release the package under gpl. Has
that changed or is senility completely catching up with me.

Nicholas


Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:00:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Roger Bivand <roger.biv...@nhh.no>
To: rick reeves <ree...@nceas.ucsb.edu>
Cc: "r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch" <r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Alternate methods: Polygon Algebra / Polygon
        Overlay with R Spatial objects..
Message-ID: <alpine.lrh.2.00.1001151932080.18...@reclus.nhh.no>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, rick reeves wrote:

Hello List:

I have been reviewing techniques within R for performing the GIS-like operation 'polygon algebra' (computing the union and intersection of polygons within two SpatialPolygonDataFrame objects). The goal is to combine two polygon data frames, to produce a new polygon data frames that contain the union or intersection of the two input sets.

Thus far, the only method that I have found for this is the combinePolys() method within the PBSmapping package. The PBSmapping routines work well, but require the transformation out of the SpatialXXXDataFrame classes.
For union, aka dissolve, see unionSpatialPolygons() in maptools. Perhaps better, don't look yet. The underlying problem is the license of the gpclib package, which should be avoided. The reason for attention to package licenses is that CRAN is getting very large, and taking responsibility for distributing non-free software through package dependencies needs to be automated. So GPL and other free packages should not depend on or suggest non-free packages, because users (including commercial users) may not be aware that they are using packages with non-free licences. Some of these users already block the installation of free packages with "upstream" non-free dependencies, and more will do so in the future.

One solution is the R-Forge rgeos package, which I'm working on.

https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/rgeos/

Before long, again thanks to Uwe Ligges and others, we should have a working production line for Windows binary packages with GEOS 3.1.1 included. Linux distributions have binaries or can install from source; OSX has a Kyngchaos framework to handle the external dependency on GEOS.

rgeos has unionSpatialPolygonsGEOS(), which, when rgeos reaches CRAN,
will be used by maptools in unionSpatialPolygons() if rgeos is available.

GEOS has the necessary functions to do what you would like, but someone has to write the R and C code and add it to rgeos. The current SpatialLinesIntersections() function returns a SpatialPointsDataFrame object with the IDs if the intersecting lines, but more is needed for SpatialPolygons intersection. The handling of the data frame variables is far from obvious too - just copying across count or rate variables isn't appropriate. Most likely the handling of the data slots would have to be done by hand for the new SpatialPolygons objects based on the intersecting ID values.

R-Forge has the possibility for new developers to join projects ...

Hope this helps,

Roger

The overlay() method within sp seems like the best routine for this job as it
performs intersection operations on pairs of Spatial objects, but it
does not appear to operate on two SpatialPolygonDataFrame objects.
So I have not tried to use it for this.

Do other packages contain polygon algebra routines that operate on the Spatial classes?
If not, are there any alternatives to the PBSmapping methods?

Thanks,
Rick R




--
Roger Bivand
Economic Geography Section, Department of Economics, Norwegian School of
Economics and Business Administration, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen,
Norway. voice: +47 55 95 93 55; fax +47 55 95 95 43
e-mail: roger.biv...@nhh.no



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo


End of R-sig-Geo Digest, Vol 77, Issue 13
*****************************************

_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo

--
Edzer Pebesma
Institute for Geoinformatics (ifgi), University of Münster Weseler Straße 253, 48151 Münster, Germany. Phone: +49 251 8333081, Fax: +49 251 8339763 http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de http://www.52north.org/geostatistics e.pebe...@wwu.de

_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo

Reply via email to