Nick Matzke wrote:
> All sites are informative under likelihood,
... and under Bayesian methods, and under distance matrix methods too. If you
leave out "uninformative" sites without compensating for doing that by an
explicit statistical correction, you will have some very unpleasant surprises.
J.F.
----
Joe Felsenstein j...@gs.washington.edu
Department of Genome Sciences and Department of Biology,
University of Washington, Box 355065, Seattle, WA 98195-5065 USA
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
