Can we make it a federal crime to imprison people in a law library
whenever they misuse the word copyright? Which seems like every time
the word copyright is uttered.

The Authors Guild position on the Kindle from the very beginning had
nothing to do with copyright. It was a simple matter of a perceived
violation of licensing rights in authors' book contracts. You can
argue whether the matter was a violation or not, but no matter how you
argue it, copyright was never an issue.

http://www.authorsguild.org/advocacy/articles/e-book-rights-alert-amazons-kindle-2.html

2/12/09
Reading to your kids note: A Wall Street Journal article quoted a
portion of an interview with Authors Guild executive director Paul
Aiken regarding the Kindle 2. The remarks have been interpreted by
some as suggesting that the Guild believes that private out-loud
reading is protected by copyright. It isn't, unless the reading is
being done by a machine. And even out-loud reading by a machine is
fine, of course, if it's from an authorized audio copy. Others suggest
that challenging Amazon's use of this software challenges
accessibility to the visually impaired. It doesn't: Kindle 2 isn't
designed for such use. The Guild continues to support efforts to make
works truly accessible to the visually impaired.

And http://www.authorsguild.org/advocacy/articles/kindle-accessibility.html

4/7/09
Today's protest is unfortunate and unnecessary. We stand by our offer,
first made to the Federation's lawyer a month ago and repeated several
times since, to negotiate in good faith to reach a solution for making
in-print e-books accessible to everyone. We extend that same offer to
any group representing the disabled.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to