> The remarks have been interpreted by > some as suggesting that the Guild believes that private out-loud > reading is protected by copyright. It isn't, unless the reading is > being done by a machine. And even out-loud reading by a machine is > fine, of course, if it's from an authorized audio copy.
I don't get it. That explicitly say it is not protected by copyright "unless it is read by a machine" in what they consider an unauthorized audio copy. So why claim this says it is not a matter of copyright? cd --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
