William D Clinger scripsit:
> According to the current draft R6RS, implementations
> are not allowed to "abort at run time"; they would
> have to raise a &violation exception, from which the
> program might conceivably recover in a portable way.
According to 2.7, however, if there is a syntax error (and
(if (foo))
is a syntax error, just as
((((((
is, the program or library is not allowed to begin execution.
In the former case, I do not see how raising an exception can possibly
take effect; in the latter case, there can't possibly be any handler
at all.
--
A few times, I did some exuberant stomping about, John Cowan
like a hippo auditioning for Riverdance, though [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I stopped when I thought I heard something at http://ccil.org/~cowan
the far side of the room falling over in rhythm
with my feet. -- Joseph Zitt
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
