I agree with Matthias on this. On 2/24/07, William D Clinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current draft already mandates hundreds of runtime exceptions whose whimsical purpose is to make programs that violate the requirements of the R6RS less likely to run to completion. Why should that kind of whimsy be limited to run time?
I'm less concerned about running to completion (as I have been known to write programs that don't), as I am with running from initiation. I'd like to get as far as *starting* my program even if it won't finish. -- ~jrm _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
