--- "R. Kent Dybvig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm thinking that the "once-only" restriction should apply to top-level > > definitions and expressions as well. Am I correct? > > If you mean "top-level program definitions and expressions", yes, or at > least almost. The once-only would be implied (by the mechanism for > converting top-level programs to libraries) for the definitions of a > top-level program and for expressions that come before the definitions. > The once-only is not implied and not necessary for the expressions that > follow all definitions.
Kent- I thought your formal comment was quite cogent. I also truly appreciated your response with examples to Findler. I think it set the bar for illustrating the problem and the solution with some simple code. You've lost me here, though, with the "mechanism for converting top-level programs to libraries" part. I re-read sections 1.10 and 1.11 and chapters 6 and 7, but I still don't see what you're talking about. Could you clarify? Nate T. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
