On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:36 PM, AndrevanTonder wrote:
But I think the statement "The effect of returning twice to the
continuation of the last body expression is unspecified", allows an
implementation to output the above, to output
(0 0)
("wizard" "Oz")
or to fail, all without violating the spec :-)
I think Kent carefully crafted his example to not return to the
continuation
of the last body expression twice (it gets in, does the damage, and
gets out).
Aziz,,,
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
