> > Note: Perhaps a solution is to have two variants of the procs, one for
> > code points and one for code units. The code units variants would
> > guarantee O(1) and the code point ones wouldn't.
>
> That might make sense. (I assume you mean "Unicode scalar value"
> rather than "code point". I checked http://www.unicode.org/glossary/ )
Yes.
> The goal would be to permit at least UTF=8 and UTF-16 internal
> representations. (Other representations should also be allowed,
> but might be less useful.) The O(1) functions would get and set
> the 8-bit or 16-bit values.
Yes.
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
