> Then we'd have uchar and ustring and, perhaps, > fewer backward-compatibility issues.
In case it wasn't clear what that meant: in the name of backward compatibility the new Unicode char type implements various (Unicode) character operations that really only make sense for (Unicode) strings. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
