Thomas Lord scripsit: > And, in general, one thing that might be more widely > agreed upon than either my formal comment or srfi-52 > is that there is no non-controversial way to directly > extend CHAR/STRING from R5 into a full-blown > basis for Unicode programming.
Anything can be made controversial if someone chooses to controvert it. -- John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ccil.org/~cowan The known is finite, the unknown infinite; intellectually we stand on an islet in the midst of an illimitable ocean of inexplicability. Our business in every generation is to reclaim a little more land, to add something to the extent and the solidity of our possessions. --Thomas Henry Huxley _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
