Andre van Tonder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Michael Sperber wrote: > >>> * but the datum value corresponding to a >>> syntactic datum is uniquely determined. >>> >>> I also find this confusing. Clearly this cannot mean uniqueness with >>> respect to eq? Does this mean uniqueness with respect to equal? ? >> >> No. It means what it says: "uniquely determined" isn't quite the same >> thing as "unique". > > I guess I don't understand this. If it is not the same, how is it different? > The way I read the text is that the syntactic datum determines a > unique datum value, but now you seem to be saying that this unique > datum value is not unique!?
You're asking the wrong question of this sentence, I think. You want to ask about several syntactic datums, but the sentence only talks about one. (And I seem to be saying a sentence containing the term "uniquely determined", but not "unique" :-) ) -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
