I'm a little late to the discussion -- sorry if this has been covered, but:
I'm a bit concerned that the record values don't serve as namespaces for their fields or accessors. As I read it, there's no direct way to access a field of a record value using the record value and the field name, though you may be able to do it using inspection to recover the rtd and all the ancestor rtds. Is this correct? I realize that this may seem harmless and consistent with how non-record types are handled, but I would consider it a significant flaw. -- Brian Jaress [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://brian-jaress.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
