[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Interestingly, this was the approach taken by SRFI-35, although one of > its authors is also the author of SRFI-9. I didn't find any clue in the > list archive as to why named fields were preferred over accessors.
This was because the names were used to name the bits of information, which could be combined in various different ways through compound conditions. There's just no way to use positions with SRFI 35. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
