On 8/24/07, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > find some module > or library system similar to all existing ones, and give it sufficient power > to allow implementations to export their differences as modules includable by > others.
It is naive to believe that this was not the goal of the editors. Look at who the editors are and consider their experience with module systems, both in a research setting and as programmers. Read the editor's email archives to see the paths they explored. By my (admittedly weak) memory, what you write above reflects the state of the editors' thinking at least five years ago. Just to be clear, I'm not saying criticism is a bad thing, merely that the criticism is more useful to the editors (and to the Scheme community at large) if you take the time to investigate a little more fully first. Robby _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
