On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Robby Findler wrote: > On 8/24/07, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> find some module >> or library system similar to all existing ones, and give it sufficient power >> to allow implementations to export their differences as modules includable by >> others. > > It is naive to believe that this was not the goal of the editors. Look > at who the editors are and consider their experience with module > systems, both in a research setting and as programmers. Read the > editor's email archives to see the paths they explored. > > By my (admittedly weak) memory, what you write above reflects the > state of the editors' thinking at least five years ago. > > Just to be clear, I'm not saying criticism is a bad thing, merely that > the criticism is more useful to the editors (and to the Scheme > community at large) if you take the time to investigate a little more > fully first. > > Robby >
i am not saying that this was not the goal, i am saying that this goal was not met. -elf _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
