> On 8/24/07, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> find some module
>> or library system similar to all existing ones, and give it  
>> sufficient power
>> to allow implementations to export their differences as modules  
>> includable by
>> others.

On Aug 24, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Elf wrote:

> i am not saying that this was not the goal, i am saying that this  
> goal was
> not met.


Since you appear to believe that it is possible to design such a module
system after the editors appear to have spent a serious amount of time
investigating this question, I think the burden on proof is on you.

To do so, I would expect that you demonstrate your belief with two
actions:

  -- design a module system all the way thru (may require a prototype)

  -- validate with three distinct and unrelated implementations that
     your criteria can be met

I am looking forward to your completed counter-argument. Until then
I (and probably others) must consider your criticism non-constructive.

-- Matthias


_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to