On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Jon Wilson wrote:

> The first claim, otoh, is satisfiable.  Most of the existing module
> systems are fairly similar to one another.  The r5.97rs module system is
> not much like any of them.  Unless there is a fundamental manner in
> which all the existing module systems are broken, ignoring and
> undermining work that has already been done on module systems is
> foolish.

I do not agree with this.  The draft module system is very much a
common denominator of MzScheme's, Chez's, and Scheme48's models.

Andre


_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to