> According to R6RS library chapter 13, the argument to > hashtable? *must* be a hashtable, which means the > hashtable? predicate always returns true. When given > a non-hashtable as an argument, it raises an exception > instead of returning. > > I doubt whether this was the intended semantics, but > those of us who take R6RS conformance seriously will > implement it faithfully.
Hmm. Users might not hold failure to strictly conform to R6RS in this instance against an implementor, so I may risk it. Kent _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
