Bear wrote: > >I doubt whether this was the intended semantics, but > >those of us who take R6RS conformance seriously will > >implement it faithfully. > > That is ... sad. I would not choose to make a dialect > *less* useful, in an obvious way, in order to conform > to what is clearly an error in the standard.
Not to worry, Bear. So far as I can tell, no one is taking R6RS conformance seriously. I certainly don't. On Larceny's main wiki page concerning conformance, the very first of the bullet items that list sources of non-conformance says "Larceny does not conform to known errors in the R6RS." [1] Will [1] http://larceny.ccs.neu.edu/larceny-trac/wiki/ConformanceModes _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
