Derick Eddington scripsit:
> Following my comments below, I cannot see a reason why @ should not have
> been allowed to be an identifier. Is there a good reason @ should not
> be a valid identifier?
Yes, there is.
If @ were permitted as the initial character of an identifier, then it
would be ambiguous whether {,@foo} and {,@ foo} were unquotes or
splicing unquotes.
--
Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
