Shiro Kawai scripsit:
> The 'conformity' of R5RS is pretty vague, I think.
> My understanding is that any upper-compatible lexical extentions
> (which R6RS explicitly prohibits) don't break conformance. Right?
True. But this isn't upward compatible: ,@foo and ,@ foo are both instances
of splicing unquote, not of unquoted @foo and unquoted @.
--
So they play that [tune] on John Cowan
their fascist banjos, eh? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--Great-Souled Sam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
