Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (1) I assume "fixnum" is an error. > (2) Rather than "corresponding bits in ei4", which is ambiguous since > it could also mean "the bits in ei4 at positions from ei2 (inclusive) > to ei3 (exclusive)" I suggest "the low-order (- ei3 ei2) bits of ei4".
Yes - this was already on the errata list on: http://www.r6rs.org/r6rs-errata.html -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
