Michael Sperber wrote:
> Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> (1) I assume "fixnum" is an error.
>> (2) Rather than "corresponding bits in ei4", which is ambiguous since
>> it could also mean "the bits in ei4 at positions from ei2 (inclusive)
>> to ei3 (exclusive)" I suggest "the low-order (- ei3 ei2) bits of ei4".
>
> Yes - this was already on the errata list on:
>
> http://www.r6rs.org/r6rs-errata.html
Indeed, sorry. I checked the errata before reporting bitwise-copy-bit,
and then "got on a roll" so I forgot to re-check until it was too late
before reporting the bitwise-copy-bit-field problems.
--
--Per Bothner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://per.bothner.com/
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
