Ken Dickey wrote: > When I look at srfi-32 code [sorting, retracted], SCIP, Scheme and the Art of > Programming, Concrete Abstractions, ..., grep for used of (< n) in code > [legal in Chez, Gambit, Ikarus -- which disallow (<)] I have not yet found a > use of the form (< n).
Just because there are no syntactic occurrences doesn't mean < is not applied to zero or one arguments. I bet similarly you cannot find any occurrences of (+) or (+ n). David PS FWIW, as a result of the discussion I think there are two consistent positions: < takes exactly two arguments, or < takes zero or more arguments. My preference is for the latter. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
