Ken Dickey scripsit: > The naive reading (for a non-English speaker) would be that +2i is somehow > less real than +inf.0 . 8^)
That's just what it is: less real -- in fact, not real at all. Non-real numbers aren't magnitudes, and < does not and should not accept them as arguments. -- An observable characteristic is not necessarily John Cowan a functional requirement. --John Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
