I think it was Will who said that there is now a lot of experience in implementing R6RS, with six or so implementations, so it might be time to start the process for R7RS. (I'm sure Will will correct me if I'm wrong. ;-)
I don't have an opinion one way or the other about when to start the R7RS process, but I wonder whether there has been enough experience by users (not implementors) of R6RS to inform a new R7RS process. Should we wait until there has been more user code for R6RS? There certainly was a lot of user code for R5RS before the R6RS process got going :-). Brad _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
