On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Brian Harvey <[email protected]> wrote: > IMHO we should be wary of the word "progress."
Its definition is one of the things that the process should elicit. Same goes for "groups" and their "desires". I am interested to see how the "weighted voting model" works out. Case in point: how many agreements on a signle definition of progress from a bunch of nobodies has the same value as the definition from an implementer? I'm relying on the process people to figure it out. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
