John Cowan <[email protected]> writes: > Brian Harvey scripsit: > >> Should there be one language for both? No; there should be Common Lisp for >> the industrial users and Scheme for the academic users. > > I'm closer to an industrial user (except not), but I don't wanna use Common > Lisp. I don't *like* Common Lisp. I wanna use Scheme. > While I would qualify neither as an "industrial" user nor as an academical one (as I'm using Scheme to hack free software in my spare time), I also prefer Scheme over CL. Probably many non-academic users feel the same way (preferring a Lisp-1 over a Lisp-2).
Rotty _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
