On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Alex Queiroz <[email protected]> wrote: > I intended to say that the idea "Users pushed for R6RS because > they are pragmatic and want to build things, researchers and > implementers hated it because they just want to publish papers and > think about PLs" is inaccurate.
Thanks for the clarification. That is not what I meant. I feel like standardization serves two different groups; regardless of whether they like R3RS, ERR5RS, R6RS, or whatever; and that the steering committe will have their work cut out for them to figure out how to serve both communities. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
