Thomas Lord <[email protected]> says:
>> Requiring supermajorities is tantamount to minority rule. 
>
> California almost went bust because of the problem you
> are talking about.

This is, imho, a dangerous metaphor.  The California legislature, like
all such political bodies, is /not/ a forum of colleagues struggling to
work out the common good.  It is a battleground to which a myriad of
subsets of the super-rich people send their gladiators to fight out which
subset gets to take home the spoils.  In such a context, where there is no
principled basis for voting, no commitment to a common purpose, and no
right answers, but there /is/ a need to reach /some/ answer, simple
majority rule is the most practical system for reasons that, as you say,
the California budget process makes evident.

I hope things have not reached that point among Schemers!

If we're going to look at real-world metaphors for decision-making, I
propose the Society of Friends (the Quakers).  At a Friends' Meeting for
Business, decisions large and small are made on the basis that any change
requires 100% agreement.  As a result, changes often don't happen until an
old generation dies off.  Most famously, the American Friends were quite
late to enter the Abolitionist movement, because for a long time there was
no consensus.  But as soon as they /did/ approve an Abolitionist position,
Quakers very quickly rose to positions of national leadership in the fight
against slavery -- because every Quaker was wholeheartedly committed to
that fight.  [I'm not a Quaker; when I was a grad student I took a scholarly
interest in consensus decision-making and that's when I learned all this.]

That's how people who share a common set of core beliefs make decisions.

P.S.  "100% agreement" doesn't actually mean that everyone has to be
terrifically enthusiastic about the proposed new policy, just that everyone
has to feel comfortable with it.

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to