> Indeed. It shows what is to my mind the deepest cleavage in the > community, between the party of innovation and the party of arrested > innovation. (I forget who first used these terms: I saw them some forty > years ago in a paper on academic politics.)
"...The party of arrested innovation?" Please, could we stop with the ad hominem attacks? It should be possible to have a fun, technical discussion without being rude. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
