John Cowan <[email protected]> says: > In any case, I'd rather see such symbols distinct in the sense of eq? but > perhaps indistinct in the sense of eqv? or equal?.
Fine, as long as variable binding equality is based on eqv? or equal?. > (The change from -a to -e in the ending of the third, critical, word is > an automatic consequence of Turkish vowel harmony rules.) Then Turks had better not have two variable names, one ending in -a and the other in -e, otherwise equal, hadn't they better, just in case they want to text someone their Scheme code? (I am matching your ironic tone but am making an equally serious point to yours -- truly, isn't /that/ the moral of your story? Regardless of what position R7RS takes on case sensitivity?) PS Yeah, cute sig. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
