Brian Harvey wrote: > We now have the macro tail wagging the Scheme dog.
Other than the absence of a specified REPL semantics in R6RS (which appears to be an omission that can be addressed by a SRFI or future Scheme standard), I don't see evidence of this. Could you be more specific? David _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
